“The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of an originating motion brought by two female officers who sought a declaration that the Regulations that provide for the termination of the appointment of married female officers on the grounds that their family obligations are affecting the efficient performance of their duties contravene section 4(b) and/or (d) of the Constitution because they unfairly discriminate against women…”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *